• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET 3I OSSEOTITE TAPERED CERTAIN PREVAIL IMPLANT 5/4 X 10MM; DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET 3I OSSEOTITE TAPERED CERTAIN PREVAIL IMPLANT 5/4 X 10MM; DENTAL IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number XIITP5410
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Osteolysis (2377)
Date of Event 05/22/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).A4: weight unknown / not provided.E1: last/given name unknown / not provided.Product has been received by zimvie and the investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the buccal plate fractured.The implant was 50 of torque then zero torque once the plate fractured.Bone loss was also reported.The implant was removed,.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimvie received one (1) xiitp5410, (osseotite® tapered certain® prevail® implant 5/4 x 10mm) for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned device identified the implant with signs of use, markings from removal and debris attached to the internal and external threads.No damage identified or signs of malfunction that would have contributed to the events.Measurements match drawing.Functional testing to recreate the reported events could not be performed due to the nature of the device & events.This complaint refers to the specific device being investigated for this complaint record.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 2120000963.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported events, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 2120000963 for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: ¿bone fracture¿ & "bone loss".The customer did not submit images for the reported events.Based on the investigation and risk management file review as per rmf rm-00053-haz rev.12, the most likely root causes determined from the investigation are patient condition / patient factors.Refer to attached summary investigation for ¿bone loss¿.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did not occur.The reported events were non-verifiable with all the available information.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.Similar complaints for bone loss related problems have been previously investigated.Refer to attached summary investigation.Visual and dimensional evaluations of the previously returned product have not identified or suggested manufacturing non-conformances.Furthermore, the probability of manufacturing or design defects that might lead to bone loss escaping the available detections is remote and almost nonexistent.Zimvie quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming product.Additionally, all device history record reviews verified that each implant was sterilized per procedure for every device.All complaint data used for the summary investigation was found to be conforming and did not meet capa/hhe/d/ or any further escalations.Therefore, there were no complaints which confirmed a manufacturing or design related issue that did or could cause or contribute to the reported event.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.The following sections have been updated: b4: date of this report g3: date received by manufacturer g6: checked "follow-up" h2: checked follow-up type h3: changed "no" to "yes" h6: entered evaluation codes h10: added manufacturer narrative.
 
Event or Problem Description
No further event information available at the time of this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OSSEOTITE TAPERED CERTAIN PREVAIL IMPLANT 5/4 X 10MM
Common Device Name
DENTAL IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET 3I
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET 3I
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer Contact
carlos gordian-arroyo
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens, FL 33410
5619713230
MDR Report Key19634279
Report Number0001038806-2024-01375
Device Sequence Number8793429
Product Code DZE
UDI-Device Identifier00844868022152
UDI-Public(01)00844868022152(17)280711(10)2120000963
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K130949
Exemption Number5645646
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberXIITP5410
Device Lot Number2120000963
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/05/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/28/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/13/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/12/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-