• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. DYNOMITE 2.0 PK W/NDL 12-0 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. DYNOMITE 2.0 PK W/NDL 12-0 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72201881
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/11/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an arthroscopy, the dynomite pk anchor broke.The procedure was completed with a s+n back up device.It is unknown if there was a surgical delay and no further complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation.However an image evaluation was performed and found the device anchor is broken.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of polymer specifications, found that the raw material strength requirements and storage requirements are specified and each lot must be accompanied by a material certificate of analysis.The root cause of the reported event could not be determined since findings cannot lead to a clear cause of the reported event.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include rough handling or excessive force to the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was not received for evaluation.However, another device was received.A visual inspection of this device revealed it was returned in original packaging with the batch number of the complaint on the label.The anchor returned with the complaint is not a dynomite 2.0 peek, it is for a footprint device.It has bio debris.The distal plug has been deployed.The tip has been fractured.The two sutures, two needles, and the insertion device have no visible defect.A material assessment of the dynomite peek anchor could not be performed due to the part not being returned for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the material specification found that the raw material strength requirements and storage requirements are specified and each lot must be accompanied by a material certificate of analysis.An analysis of the customer provided image shows the device anchor is broken.The root cause could not be determined since findings cannot lead to a clear cause of the reported event.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force or torsion during use, use of sharp instruments near the device tip, or twisting of the tip that could lead to the needle cutting across the suture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.H11: corrected information in h6 (correction).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DYNOMITE 2.0 PK W/NDL 12-0 ULTRABRAID
Common Device Name
STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key19657540
Report Number1219602-2024-01414
Device Sequence Number17779487
Product Code JDR
UDI-Device Identifier03596010619068
UDI-Public03596010619068
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K081511
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number72201881
Device Lot Number2123133
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/12/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/06/2024
12/04/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/02/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/07/2024
12/06/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/16/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age31 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight66 KG
-
-