|
The reporter stated from the lead tech and physician's perspective: "dr.(b)(6) was the attending on the case for the renal bx.On the first pass, the device fired and collected a sample, but it was believed the device fired at 33mm instead of the selected 23mm throw length.The device was observed and the throw length adjuster was still on the 23 mm throw length.A second pass was done and measurement on the us machine showed the device did fire at 33 mm instead of the selected 23, and the throw length adjuster was still at the selected 23 mm.A new device was opened, tested, and used for the remained of the bx.That device was inspected by dr.(b)(6) and dr.(b)(6) as well, and they all agreed the device was firing on the 33mm length even though the throw length adjuster was on the 23 mm throw.When looking back at the us images, it looks like the device jumps back and then forward when fired.Two other devices of that lot we opened and tested and appeared to be fine and firing correctly at the 23 mm throw." the customer does not have the needle used for the case with the initial issue, the resident discarded it.They have the label from the packaging.There is a video of the second throw on the case, as well as a still image of the approximate measurement of the throw.
|
|
A review of the manufacturing and inspection records for this lot was conducted.No deviations or non-conformances were found.One opened sample and eleven unopened samples were returned from the customer for review.A visual inspection of the opened device was performed, and no damage was found.The device was test fired five times and functioned as designed.The unopened device will be tested during the failure investigation study.The complaint is confirmed.A failure investigation has been initiated to determine the root cause of this issue, and implement any corrective actions needed.
|