|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 M.R.I. LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT,HICKMAN SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
0603880 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4453); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
06/16/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiration date: 03/2018) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that two years, two months, and twenty-seven days post a port placement in the right subclavian vein, the catheter was allegedly fractured.It was further reported that the fractured catheter had allegedly embolized to the patient's right atrium and right ventricle.Furthermore, the catheter allegedly traversed the tricuspid valve into the patient's right ventricle causing tricuspid valve regurgitation.Reportedly, the patient underwent surgery for retrieving the fractured and embolized catheter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported catheter fracture, material separation and migration issues as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical condition alleged in the reported event cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that two years, two months, and twenty-seven days post a port placement in the right subclavian vein, the catheter was allegedly fractured.It was further reported that the fractured catheter had allegedly embolized to the patient's right atrium and right ventricle.Furthermore, the catheter allegedly traversed the tricuspid valve into the patient's right ventricle causing tricuspid valve regurgitation.Reportedly, the patient underwent surgery for retrieving the fractured and embolized catheter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|