|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.E3: clinical director.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Corrected information: d4.Investigation evaluation: description of event: as reported, a black silicone filiform double pigtail ureteral stent had a piece break off before the unspecified procedure was started.The device did not make patient contact.No adverse effects were reported.Additional information regarding event details has been requested but no additional information has been provided.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control (qc) procedures, as well as a visual inspection, of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.One black silicone filiform double pigtail ureteral stent was returned by the customer in two pieces with a missing coil and tether.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that that the device was manufactured to specification and there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.The ifu contains the following information related to the reported failure mode.¿precautions do not force set components during placement, replacement, or removal.Carefully remove the set components if any resistance is encountered.¿ ¿how supplied upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ the cause of the break was not able to be determined for this incident.It¿s possible that unintended customer error in the tether removal process was the root cause of the separation.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|