• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC ROADRUNNER THE FIRM HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE; DQX WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC ROADRUNNER THE FIRM HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE; DQX WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G09105
Medical Device Problem Code Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping (2969)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/03/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported by a distributor, hair-like foreign matter was noted inside the packaging of a roadrunner the firm hydrophilic wire guide.The device was not used.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
E1: phone : (b)(6).G4 ¿ pma/510(k) #: k182985.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported by a distributor, hair-like foreign matter was noted inside the packaging of a roadrunner the firm hydrophilic wire guide.The device was not used.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of customer provided photographs were conducted as well.The complaint device was not returned to cook for investigation, however the customer provided photographs showing a fiber material loose in the package.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found one relevant non-conformance on the lot; however, all affected product was scrapped and there are 100% inspections in place to capture the non-conformance.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for this lot number.This lot is not supplied with an ifu pamphlet.This lot is ifu exempt.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, customer provided photographs, and complaint file suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured out of specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Although one relevant non-conformance was noted, all non-conforming product was scrapped, there are 100% inspections in place to capture this non-conformance, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot-related complaints have been received from the field.Therefore, it was concluded that there is no evidence that additional non-conforming product exists in house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook concludes this event to be due to a manufacturing deficiency.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROADRUNNER THE FIRM HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE
Common Device Name
DQX WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key19691937
Report Number1820334-2024-00918
Device Sequence Number7240014
Product Code DQX
UDI-Device Identifier00827002091054
UDI-Public(01)00827002091054(17)260505(10)15426089
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date05/05/2026
Device Model NumberG09105
Device Catalogue NumberRPC-35-260
Device Lot Number15426089
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/20/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/02/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/08/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/23/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/05/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-