|
EXACTECH, INC. TRULIANT TIB IMP CRC INSERT SZ 5, 13MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
02-022-51-5013 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
08/30/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D10: concomitant devices: (5681048) 02-020-14-0350 - truliant cr por fem cr por right sz 5.(5991401) 02-022-55-5040 - truliant por tib tray size 5f/4t.(6165715) 02-020-13-0350 - truliant cr cem fem cr cem right sz 5 (6770986) 200-07-35 - advanced.Patella 35mm 3 peg implant (6891643) 201-78-25 - small headed sharp pin, 1 1/8" 4 pack.The product associated with the reported event is within the scope of recall z-0023-2022; however, there is insufficient information to evaluate whether the subject issue of the recall was the cause or contributor to the reported event.The device was not returned for evaluation and no medical or other records containing treatment information or patient information have been received; therefore, the reported event cannot be confirmed, nor can the circumstances or potential causes or contributors to the alleged event be evaluated.Should additional material information become available that permits more analysis or conclusions, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported via legal documentation that approximately 17 months after a right total knee replacement procedure, the patient underwent a revision procedure to address prosthesis wear.No further issues or complications were reported.No additional information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: corrected type of investigation.The reason for the revision reported cannot be determined from the available information but may have been reported at this later time due to inclusion of one of the implanted devices in the packaging recall.Based on length of implantation, the reason for revision appears unlikely to be secondary to prosthesis wear.However, the reported prosthesis wear/failure could not be confirmed and potential contributions of user, or patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as no images or radiographs were provided, relevant clinical information was not provided, and the devices were not available for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|