|
As reported, upon opening the packaging of a safe-t-j fixed core wire guide, the tip was "peeling off" and the wire was slightly bent.Per the reporter, the wire was altered from its original condition; however, the device was not used.A new wire guide was used to complete the procedure.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to the occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Correction: d4 additional information: d9 summary of event: as reported, upon opening the packaging of a safe-t-j fixed core wire guide, the tip was "peeling off" and the wire was slightly bent.Per the reporter, the wire was altered from its original condition; however, the device was not used.A new wire guide was used to complete the procedure.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to the occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection was conducted as well.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.Red biological matter (rust like appearance) was noted running the full length of the wire guide and noted inside the wire guide holder.Small partials of the coating were coming from the device near the distal tip.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found no relevant non-conformances on the lot.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for this lot number.An expanded device history record was performed for this complaint.Eleven additional related lot over a three-month period were reviewed.The reviewed additional lots did not have any relevant nonconformances and did not have any complaints.Considering the above compiled information, there is no evidence that additional nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, returned device, and complaint file suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured out of specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded the flaking or peeling of the teflon coating is a manufacturing deficiency.The flaking most likely happened during the wire guide being assembled.With the flushing of the product and then with the flaking of the teflon corrosion eventually occurred due to the flaking of the teflon.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|