| Catalog Number |
1949 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Positioning Failure (1158)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/10/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the gingival cuff (1949) could not be attached to the implant body.The doctor said that the male thread was not properly threaded, which may have caused a defective product.Completed with another identical product.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to report additional information.The following sections are being reported: d4: unique identifier (udi) number.H2: if follow-up, what type.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer.H4: device manufacturer date.H6: type of investigation.H6: investigation findings.H6: investigation conclusions.H10: additional narratives/data.Zimvie did not receive one healing abutment for evaluation.Visual inspection could not be performed.The investigation has been performed based on the available information using the item number, device history record (dhr) review, and risk management file (rmf).Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation were missing or confusing instructions for use and torque applied during placement/seating exceeds recommended value.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction could not be verified.The reported event is non-verifiable no further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional or corrected information to report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.D9: device availability and return date were updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation codes were added: 10.H6: investigation findings code was added: 213.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 67.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received the reported abutment for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed, slight damage to threads.Functionally tested in-house implant and engages, retains and disengages as intended but with force.Even though there is wear on the threads due to the usage of the product no malfunction was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was torque applied during placement/seating exceeds recommended value.Therefore, based on the available information, device malfunction did not occur.Wear/damage to threads due to usage however product was able to be seated with in-house implant.The reported event is unconfirmed.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The reported device was returned and evaluated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|