|
SYNTHES GMBH AIMING ARM/LAT/F/MULTILOC PROXIMAL HUMERAL NAIL; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
03.019.008 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/14/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.E3: reporter is a j&j employee.H6: the subject device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2024, the patient underwent orif surgery with the products in question.This is a report of intraoperative interference between the drill tip and the intramedullary nail.During the surgery, after insertion of an intramedullary nail and proximal fixation, distal anterolateral screw fixation was performed.During distal posterolateral screw fixation, the drill tip interfered with the intramedullary nail.After interference, because of the possibility of force on the sleeve due to soft tissue tension, a small amount of skin incision and deployment was added.Attempted to drill again but again there was interference.The surgeon pulled out the drill and tried to drill a hole with a smaller 3.0 mm diameter k-wire, but the interference happened again.The connection between the intramedullary nail and the handle and the connection between the aiming arm and the insertion handle were checked again for looseness.There was no interference during the dry check before insertion.When checked from the side with the sleeve in place, it was clearly observed that the sleeve was displaced backward.The surgeon considered removing the aiming arm and performing the insertion by freehand, but decided against it due to the rearward insertion from the outside and the long drill tip.Eventually the interference had been resolved.The end cap was inserted and the wound was closed.There are no pieces in the patient.The surgeon confirmed by x-ray.The surgery was completed successfully with 30 minutes surgical delay.After the surgery, the drill was confirmed to have passed because the surgeon had performed a thorough soft tissue development again.Patient outcome is reported as stable.This report is for one (1) aiming arm/lat/f/multiloc proximal humeral nail.This is report 4 of 9 for complaint (b)(4).This complaint is related to (b)(4) which captures additional impacted devices.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H3, h4, h6: the product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that there were no damage or defect with the aim-arm lat f/multiloc phn a dimensional inspection was not performed due to it is not applicable to the complaint condition.A functional test was performed with the complete system and it fits correctly, no misalignment was observed during the test.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the aim-arm lat f/multiloc phn was found to have no damage or defects.No definitive root cause could be determined.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review (dhr): part # 03.019.008; lot # 8346826; manufacturing site: werk hagendorf; release to warehouse date: 13 may 2013; expiration date: n/a; supplier: n/a.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished article lot and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|