• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 6900PTFX
Medical Device Problem Codes Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Device Stenosis (4066)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Chest Pain (1776); Dyspnea (1816); Fatigue (1849); Swelling/ Edema (4577); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 06/17/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 27mm 6900ptfx mitral valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 4 years, 2 months due to unknown reasons.The procedure was performed with a 26mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional 'customer complaint'.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: b7, g3, g6, h2, h6(type of investigation) corrected sections: h6(component code, clinical code, device code, investigation findings, investigation conclusion).Stenosis is a common manifestation of bioprosthetic valve and valved conduit dysfunction and has many potential root causes, including structural valve deterioration (svd), non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd), endocarditis and/or thrombosis.Bioprosthetic device stenosis is typically related to patient and/or procedural factors and is not typically an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency.The most likely root cause is patient-related factors, including coronary artery disease, history of coronary artery bypass graft, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia and chemotherapy.The subject device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.The device history record (dhr) review was completed, and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry and medical records that a patient with a 27mm 6900ptfx mitral valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of four (4) years, two (2) months due to severe stenosis, moderate central leak and mild pvl.Patient presented with shortness of breath, fatigue, occasional chest pain and peripheral edema.The procedure was performed with a 26mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve.Per medical records, echo showed mean gradient of 14.7 with moderate central leak and mild pvl.Tee revealed severe mitral stenosis.Patient was not a candidate for mvr due to patient initial mvr being difficult as a result of significantly calcified posterior annulus and enlarged la.This is a 75-year-old female patient edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional customer complaint.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2 - office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key19726912
Report Number2015691-2024-05297
Device Sequence Number20905632
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103163599
UDI-Public(01)00690103163599(17)230414
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOK
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/14/2023
Device Model Number6900PTFX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/25/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/24/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/11/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/03/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/15/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening; Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-