• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 12TLW804F
Medical Device Problem Code Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/08/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during use in patient while testing this fogarty embolectomy catheter, the balloon burst.The device was received for evaluation and the balloon was found to be ruptured in the middle area, the edges of latex did not match at the ruptured region.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was available for evaluation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
One fogarty thru-lumen embolectomy catheter was received by our product evaluation laboratory.As received, the balloon was found ruptured in the middle area.In addition, the edges of latex did not match.Finally, through lumen was patent without any leakage or occlusion.No other visible damage or abnormality was observed from catheter body or windings.Per the ifu, "balloon rupture and catheter separation as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material are the most frequent causes of reported failures." and "to minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, do not exceed the maximum recommended inflation and pull force for each size catheter".Further investigation was performed by the engineers in the manufacturing site.Based on the available information there is no evidence that supports or confirms the failure mode is associated to a manufacturing/design defect.The manufacturing records were reviewed and there is no indication of a related nonconformance; all process parameters were met, and inspections passed successfully.Additionally, the controls to detect the failure mode being evaluated are established in the manufacturing process.As part of the manufacturing process, the units go through a balloon inflation process.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Common Device Name
CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco, puerto rico 00610
*  00610
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco, puerto rico 00610
*   00610
Manufacturer Contact
samantha eveleigh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492503939
MDR Report Key19727910
Report Number2015691-2024-05301
Device Sequence Number8328453
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103043518
UDI-Public(01)00690103043518(17)240616(11)220318(10)64252722
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryKS
PMA/510(K) Number
K233820
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 07/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/16/2024
Device Model Number12TLW804F
Device Lot Number64252722
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/14/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/19/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/18/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-