|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, SILICONE SINGLE-LUMEN, KIT, 9.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1809601 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bacterial Infection (1735); Cellulitis (1768); Erythema (1840); Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
| Date of Event |
08/09/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the patient allegedly developed an infection.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that approximately one month and twenty days post a port placement for chemotherapy treatment, the patient allegedly developed with erythema.It was further reported that patient was diagnosed with bacterial infection and cellulitis.Reportedly, the port was removed and new port has been implanted.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 07/2023), g2, g3.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: a device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately one month and twenty days post port placement, patient presented to office yesterday with drainage, erythema and induration over his port concerning for infection.Blood culture was taken which showed staphylococcus aureus.Around a day later, patient underwent port removal procedure.One removal, the pocket was then irrigated with saline and no further purulent drainage, or necrotic tissue noted.An incision was made over the area of fluctuance in the right neck near where had previously made a right skin neck for placement of the wire and dilator during the original surgery.This area was likely just inflamed with cellulitis.After the port was irrigated again, it was packed with wet to dry keflix and covered with dry gauze.Around five months and twenty-three days later, patient underwent new port placement procedure.After new port placement, fluoroscopy confirmed appropriate placement at the cavo atrial junction.Fluoroscopy confirmed that there was no kinking in the tubing.The port was secured in the pocket.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported adverse events based on the medical records.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2023), g3, h6 (method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that approximately one month and twenty days post a port placement for chemotherapy treatment, the patient allegedly developed with erythema.It was further reported that patient was diagnosed with bacterial infection and cellulitis.Reportedly, the port was removed, and new port has been implanted.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|