|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. ANTHOLOGY INSERTER ANT SOFT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
71365721 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
| Date of Event |
06/25/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a thr surgery, while impacting an anthology so porous size 7 (femoral component), the threaded tip of an anthology inserter ant soft fractured.The broken tip was left inside the patient's body attached to the stem.The procedure resumed after a significant delay.No other complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H2: additional information ¿e¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h10: although the involvement of all the devices was reported, the relationship with the investigated failure was directly associated to the anthology inserter.The device was not returned for evaluation.However, the photographs were reviewed and revealed that the tip of the device fractured off.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that based on the information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported events could not be determined and we are currently unable to rule out a procedural variance as a contributing factor to the reported event, which does not represent a device malfunction.It is unclear if the surgical technique were adhered to.The anthology inserter is made of stainless steel.This is an externally communicating device, it is neither manufactured nor intended for implantation.It is also not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact is determined to be the retained broken anthology inserter tip.Micro-motion or movement cannot be predicted.There is potential risk for tissue inflammation and/or pain.Device batch number was not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history of the previous 12 months revealed similar events for the listed device, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h10 (updated results of investigation): although the involvement of all the devices was reported, the relationship with the investigated failure was directly associated to the anthology inserter.The device was not returned for evaluation.However, the photographs were reviewed and revealed that the tip of the device fractured off.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that based on the information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported events could not be determined and we are currently unable to rule out a procedural variance as a contributing factor to the reported event, which does not represent a device malfunction.It is unclear if the surgical technique were adhered to.The anthology inserter is made of stainless steel.This is an externally communicating device, it is neither manufactured nor intended for implantation.It is also not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact is determined to be the retained broken anthology inserter tip.Micro-motion or movement cannot be predicted.There is potential risk for tissue inflammation and/or pain.Device batch number was not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history of the previous 12 months revealed similar events for the listed device, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the instructions for use documents for care, maintenance, cleaning and sterilization of smith & nephew orthopedics devices revealed that visually inspecting for damage or wear, including components in their disassembled state prior to re-assembly as well as ensuring components are re-assembled securely is indicated.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d10 (femoral stem added as a concomitant), e2 (reporter is a healthcare professional), h6 (investigation conclusions).Corrected data: b1 (type of event involves also product malfunction).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|