|
Block h2: additional information.Blocks a3b (gender), b2 (outcomes attrib to adv event), b5 (describe event or problem), b7 (other relevant history), d4 (unique identifier (udi) #), h6 (patient and impact codes) have been updated based on the additional information received on november 20, 2025.Correction: block b3 (date of event) has been updated.Block b3 date of event: the exact event onset date is unknown.The provided event date of (b)(6) 2019, was chosen as a best estimate based on the date of the mesh was implanted.Block e1: this event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implanting and explanting surgeon is: dr.(b)(6).Block h6: patient code e2006 captures the reportable event of mesh erosion.Patient code e1405 captures the reportable event of dyspareunia.Patient code e2313 captures the reportable event of fibrotic tissue found.Patient code e1401 captures the reportable event of discharge.Patient code e1002 captures the reportable event of abdominal pain.Patient code e1715 captures the reportable event of scarring.Patient code e0206 captures the reportable event of loss of enjoyment of life.Patient code e2330 captures the reportable event of pain (to the sexual partner during intercourse).Impact code f08 captures the reportable event of hospitalization due to an open abdominal procedure to address her prolapse.Impact code f1901 captures the additional surgery performed to address her prolapse.Impact code f1905 captures the reportable event of excision of transvaginal tension free tape.
|
|
Note: this manufacturer report pertains to the second of the two devices used during the same procedure.Please refer to mfr report 2124215-2024-43324 for the associated device.It was reported that an upsylon y mesh was implanted into the patient during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.During the same surgery, an abdominal sacral colpopexy, halban's culdoplasty, right salpingo-oophorectomy, and cystocele repair procedure were also performed.It was noted that following this procedure, the patient experienced dyspareunia, severe pain including abdominal pain, scarring, further urinary problems, recurrent mesh erosion, discharge, and loss of enjoyment of life.The patient underwent bladder surgery in 2018, during which a sub urethral sling with mesh was placed for stress urinary incontinence, despite her reluctance.Approximately three years later, she began experiencing mesh erosion into the vagina, causing discomfort during intercourse and resulting in injury to her sexual partners.She reports the sensation of the mesh moving and "falling out." initial management included a partial mesh removal in (b)(6) 2022, followed by estrogen cream for mucosal healing, which provided limited benefit.Despite these interventions, she continued to experience significant impact on her sexual life, as her partner could feel the residual mesh during intercourse, causing pain.Additional office-based removal attempts were made in (b)(6) 2022 and (b)(6) 2023, but residual mesh remains.The patient declines further office procedures and requests definitive surgical removal.She now reports recurrence of urinary incontinence following partial mesh removal and wishes to have her incontinence corrected without use of mesh.Her prolapse was previously addressed with an open abdominal procedure requiring overnight hospitalization, though she does not recall the name of the surgery.She also reports marijuana use.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient was experiencing again dyspareunia and mesh erosion; therefore, an excision of the transvaginal tension-free tape was performed.A cystourethroscopy was performed, revealing no lesions, stitches, or trauma to the bladder.A purple mesh was found under the urethra and in a tight band.During the procedure, the patient was administered prophylactic antibiotics and pneumatic compression stockings were applied bilaterally.A vaginal exam was performed, confirming the mesh erosion.Subsequently, an inverted u incision was made in the vaginal epithelium underlying the mid urethra.The mesh was identified visually and by palpation.Allis clamps were used to grasp the vaginal flap and dissecting it from the sling.Dissection was performed as far laterally as possible; however, the mesh was interlaced with fibrotic scar tissue.The layer containing the mesh and fibrotic overlay was mobilized away from the bladder and rectum and dissected with a combination of sharp dissection, blunt dissection and hydrodissection.Once the mesh arms were visualized, they were transected at the most lateral aspect possible.Upon completion of the procedure, a cystoscopy and rectal examination were performed to rule out visceral injury.There were no further patient complications.
|