• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INVISION TALAR DOME SIZE 3 STD; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INVISION TALAR DOME SIZE 3 STD; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 60012003
Medical Device Problem Code Osseointegration Problem (3003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Limb Fracture (4518)
Date of Event 06/25/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to the talar implant subsidence with talus fracture.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to the talar implant subsidence with talus fracture.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidence were provided.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Upon further investigation of the ct scans, healthcare professionals opined that- posterior subsidence and angulation of the component relative to the talus, most likely due to poor bone quality of the talus.Patient related and device components intact.Subsidence of the talar component was the main event that indicated the revision.There was no significant fracture visible on the ct-scan.With this large amount of subsidence microfractures and resorption of bone do play part as well.We can state that the pre-revision ct scan did not show a significant fracturing of the talus.Based on investigation the failure is most likely caused by patient related factor i.E.Poor bone quality.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INVISION TALAR DOME SIZE 3 STD
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key19801717
Report Number3010667733-2024-00459
Device Sequence Number20714100
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420193940
UDI-Public00840420193940
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K171067
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number60012003
Device Lot Number1720882
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/25/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/17/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/22/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured12/20/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-