| Model Number |
MC162156S |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Entrapment of Device (1212); Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Brain Injury (2219); Intracranial Pressure Increased (4586)
|
| Date of Event |
07/05/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A search for non-conformance's associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was stated to be available for return to the manufacturer for analysis, but it has not yet been returned.Supplemental imaging and medical notes are being sought.A supplemental report will be submitted when the device and more information is obtained and analyzed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an mma embolization was being performed with liquid embolic.Upon delivering the embolic to the treatment zone, the physician tried to removed the catheter and could not as the glue adhered to the tip of the headway duo microcatheter.After pulling hard, the catheter fractured and the distal portion remained in the patient.The proximal remainder was removed.It was reported that intervention was performed.Two days post procedure, the patient returned to the hospital with a midline shift and is now reported to be in a deteriorating condition as the brain is now swollen and has a buildup of pressure.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an mma embolization was being performed with liquid embolic.Upon delivering the embolic to the treatment zone, the physician tried to removed the catheter and could not as the glue adhered to the tip of the headway duo microcatheter.After pulling hard, the catheter fractured and the distal portion remained in the patient.The proximal remainder was removed.It was reported that intervention was performed.Two days post procedure, the patient returned to the hospital with a midline shift and is now reported to be in a deteriorating condition as the brain is now swollen and has a buildup of pressure.Updated information was received from the physician.The intervention that was performed during the procedure was an attempted snare of the proximal portion of the catheter with a gooseneck snare.The patient was reported to now be doing well overall.The physician did not consider any of the clinical consequences attributable to the catheter to be appreciable.The procedure was a elective mma embolization for a stable subdural hematoma.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information was received via email from the physician.Updates were made to b5 (the intervention that was performed during the procedure was an attempted snare of the proximal portion of the catheter with a gooseneck snare.The patient was reported to now be doing well overall.The physician did not consider any of the clinical consequences attributable to the catheter to be appreciable.The procedure was a elective mma embolization for a stable subdural hematoma.).The device was received - d10 was updated.The physician stated that imaging was not available.Device evaluation: items returned for investigation: headway-duo (b)(4) items not returned for investigation: n/a the device was returned with residual fluid and embolic in the hub.The distal end of the microcatheter was broken and showed signs of stretching.The investigation found the catheter returned with residual liquid embolic in the hub and the distal end broken with signs of stretching at the site of the break, which is consistent with the condition described in the reported event.The physical evaluation of the device could not determine the exact conditions or circumstances that led to the distal tip break, but this damage is consistent with the distal tip becoming entrapped in an embolic substance followed by retraction forces that exceeded the tensile strength of the microcatheter.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|