• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC. 2.6F X 50CM DUAL LUMEN PICC W/MST; VASCU-PICC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC. 2.6F X 50CM DUAL LUMEN PICC W/MST; VASCU-PICC Back to Search Results
Model Number MR170126024S
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/10/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
We are currently waiting for the device to be returned for evaluation.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
During the mobilization of a patient, the picc broke apart at the connection point.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The 2.6f vascu picc was returned for evaluation in two pieces.The lumen is separate from the rest of the device.Visual inspection revealed the lumen was torn off at the hub.Under magnification it can be seen that the dual lumen is sufficiently attached inside the hub.Both ends of the lumen were also viewed under magnification.While one is smooth and straight, the other is jagged indicative of being torn.Medcomp engineering and product management further reviewed the device and confirmed the lumen was properly placed in the hub during manufacturing.The jagged end of the lumen is indicative of the thin lumen being pulled with a greater force than it is designed to withstand, causing it to tear.The contract manufacturer conducted a review of the manufacture records for the lot number reported.Their investigation revealed the device was manufactured and inspected according to specification with no non-conformances or abnormalities.The manufacture process includes a 100% leak test performed as a last step in the process.This test would have detected any leaks, holes, or weak spots if it had existed at the time of manufacture.The information provided stated the picc broke "during the mobilization of a patient".There is no evidence of a manufacturing issue.A definitive root cause for the failure could not be determined, however the information provided suggests mishandled device and possible user error may have contributed to the failure of the device.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2.6F X 50CM DUAL LUMEN PICC W/MST
Common Device Name
VASCU-PICC
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC.
1499 delp drive
harleysville PA 19438
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC.
1499 delp drive
harleysville PA 19438
Manufacturer Contact
lynn winkler
1499 delp drive
harleysville, PA 19438
2152564201
MDR Report Key19816690
Report Number2518902-2024-00051
Device Sequence Number8780922
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00884908105131
UDI-Public00884908105131
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySZ
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/14/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Other
Device Expiration Date04/30/2024
Device Model NumberMR170126024S
Device Catalogue NumberMR170126024S
Device Lot NumberMRAD280
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/16/2024
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/24/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/24/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-