|
A dräger service engineer has performed an on-site check with the device and found no issue with it which would require repair or correction.This is substantiated by the aspect that the device remained in use after the event and did not exhibit further issues.The log file was downloaded from the device and analyzed by the manufacturer.The records indicate that the device was in operation for three cycles on the reported date of event (the log does not indicate if a patient was connected or a test lung only).The exact time of event was not transmitted but the device alarmed for "supply pressure low" during all three use cycles of the day.The oxylog 3000plus is an emergency and transport ventilator which can be operated via a dedicated o2 cylinder or can be connected to central gas supply as well, alternatively.When operated via gas cylinder, the duration for which the alarm "supply pressure low" will be generated is not long since the relatively small gas cylinder becomes empty in the following quickly.In the particular case, the "supply pressure low" alarm condition was longer present, an aspect from which it is concluded that the ventilator was rather connected to central gas supply.The "supply pressure low" condition provides evidence that, each time the device demands a gas flow from the source to apply a breathing hub, the gas intaking resulted in a significant pressure drop.A reasonable explanation would be that the central gas supply was not capable to provide a sufficient gas flow without significant pressure drop at the point the device was connected to, or the supply hose had an increased pneumatic resistance due to its long length; a combination of both factors that worsened the situation would also be imaginable.In consequence of the insufficient supply pressure the minute volume delivered to the patient opening was insufficient; the device has posted corresponding "mve low" alarms and also "airway pressure low" messages.Additionally, there was obviously a leakage in the patient circuit since the device has also posted the dedicated "leakage" alarms.An indication for the presence of a technical issue with the device was not found.Dräger recommends to perform a pre-use check with the entire set-up including patient circuit at least after each exchange of the patient circuit because the measurement of compliance and resistance in advance is required to calculate adequate ventilation parameter.The entire device log contains no hint that a successful pre-use check has been provided with the device.Dräger finally concludes that the reported event was not the consequence of technical deviations with the device itself but must be attributed to a chain of use errors.The leakage in the patient circuit as well as the insufficient supply pressure are not related to the ventilator; these aspects will be detected during pre-use check but none was performed, obviously.During use of the device, the corresponding alarms were posted.All alarms, potential root causes and dedicated remedies are listed in the ifu.
|