|
It was reported a cardiac perforation and pericardial effusion occurred.The procedure was cancelled.During an atrial fibrillation (a fib) ablation procedure, a versacross connect for faradrive was selected for use.The physician gained femoral access and inserted a non-boston scientific intracardiac echocardiography (ice) and sound fam catheters.Then, the versacross rf wire followed by the versacross dilator and faradrive sheath was inserted.When the devices were dropped down from superior vena cava (svc) to right atrium (ra), the physician noticed some unusual tactile feedback.On the fluoroscopy, it was noted the versacross rf wire was in ra but could not be visualized on ice.The physician pulled everything back to re-position into svc but was unable to get the wire back out.Then, the physician swept through atria with ice and noticed a growing effusion.The procedure was aborted, and effusion was being monitored, which grew continuously.The patient was given anticoagulant reversal agents and a pericardiocentesis was performed.The patient was admitted to the hospital beyond standard of care, spent the night following the case but has recovered.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis (disposed).A trace effusion was noted prior to case start.The heart was slightly rotated, so anatomy deemed not help with transseptal workflow.The versacross rf wire could not be visualized during tenting on ice which led them to believe the perforation happened with it.It could only be seen on fluoro and looked more leftward than it should have been.Similarly, the versacross dilator was seen on fluoro, but not on ice.The physician was not able to make it to the intra atrial septum.The visualization issue is hypothesized due to the patient anatomy as both fluoro and ice were being used at the time of the suspected perforation.When everything was pull out to re-approach svc, the versacross rf wire was not able to re-advanced back up the svc and continued to get stuck in raa through whatever hole might have been made.A total of 170cc of blood was pulled from the pericardial sac.In the physician opinion, it was suspected that a perforation occurred in ra/raa with versacross rf wire and dilator on svc to ra drop down prior to gaining transseptal access or with the ice catheter.
|