|
During the review of dhr, the record states that the product was inspected and accepted for use and met all specified parameters of the inspection process with no associated nonconformance specific to this product issue.The device was not returned as the patient retains the device, and could not be evaluated.Additionally, no images of the device or event radiographs were provided for analysis.Complaint cannot be confirmed.Unknown factors include: patient activity at the time or prior to the event, patient bone quality, the degree of spinal instability, the degree of pseudarthrosis (as reported), patient compliance with post-operative care instructions or if the patient sustained a fall/impact of any sort (no trauma was reported.) these factors dictate the longevity of the implant.Root cause or specific failure mode cannot be determined, but 3 years of cyclical fatigue on an unfused segment may have caused or contributed to this event.Labeling review notes: "possible adverse events.2.Disassembly, bending, and/or breakage of any or all of the components.3.Loss of fixation.".
|