• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 07/16/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4, patient weight: information unknown/not provided.Section h3, device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was not returned for evaluation as it was discarded.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain the missing information.However, to date, it has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded johnson and johnson (jnj) intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient's left eye.There were no complications such as a capsule tear, vitrectomy, or sutures.The outcome was hyperopic surprise.The iol in the patient's left eye was implanted at 80 degrees and found to be at 80 degrees as intended.Uncorrected visual acuity (ucva) is 20/100 and best corrected visual acuity (bcva) 20/20.The patient's manifest refraction (mrx) in their left eye was +1.00 spherical so the astigmatism was corrected as expected.The manifest refraction shows no cylinder as intended.The patient was not ok with their hyperopic surprise in their left eye.They also found the symptom debilitating as they used to drive but could no longer drive.Consequently, the iol was explanted and replaced with the same model and different diopter, 25.5 diopter (serial (b)(6) diu150 +25.5d).The iol is in the bag and centered.The patient is happy with the outcome.They are doing well and healing appropriately.The patient's right eye had myopic surprise but the patient is ok with it and it's not debilitating.No further information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key19925349
Report Number3012236936-2024-000214
Device Sequence Number8083590
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746626
UDI-Public(01)05050474746626(17)250806
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 08/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/06/2025
Device Model NumberDIU150
Device Catalogue NumberDIU150U240
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/24/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/06/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/06/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-