|
|
| Catalog Number |
214605 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Degraded (1153); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/30/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Event 1 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by the sales rep that during an arthroscopic shoulder labiaplasty surgical procedure on (b)(6) 2024 while using the arthro suture scissors device and cordcutter device it was observed that the safety lock and the front handle of the cutter device were quite stiff after relelase.According to the reporter, it was so hard that the surgeon could not cut two at the same time.It was reported that since device purchase, there was a strong feeling of snagging and it was getting worse and after the surgery, it has been confirmed that two ethibonds could be cut at the same time.There was no delay reported.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: d4: the device expiration date is currently unavailable.D11: concomitant med products and therapy dates: cordcutter device, (b)(6) 2024.E3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The complaint device is not being returned, it was retained by the customer, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.Since the complaint device was not returned, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If additional information or the device is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.Given that an invalid lot number was provided, a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review cannot be performed.If a valid lot number becomes available, the mre review will be performed.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|