|
Following the alleged event, the patient called customer support.Customer support attempted to perform troubleshooting and run control solution tests via telephone with the patient, but the patient refused troubleshooting and requested a replacement device.A review of reading logs transmitted by the affected device was performed.Device records showed three l1 control solution tests and zero l2 control solution tests logged by the meter.All l1 control solution test results were within the specified range.No evidence of back-to-back readings more than 15% apart on the affected device was found.Device records show patient blood glucose levels were frequently in the 300s and 400s.Based on this information, it was determined that the device functioned per specification and as intended by alerting the patient to elevated blood glucose levels.Though there is no evidence or allegation of health impact to the patient, this event is being reported out of an abundance of caution due to the patient calling 911 and receiving emergency medical assistance.The patient was contacted more than three (3) times after the event to request additional information and return of the affected device.To date, the patient has not responded, and the affected device has not been received for evaluation.
|