• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACUITY? STEERABLE; PERMANENT DEFIBRILLATOR ELECTRODES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACUITY? STEERABLE; PERMANENT DEFIBRILLATOR ELECTRODES Back to Search Results
Model Number 4554
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Device Overstimulation of Tissue (1991); Discomfort (2330); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Date of Event 07/18/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient with this left ventricular (lv) lead was experiencing phrenic nerve stimulation and chest discomfort.The physician decided to explant the lead, during the procedure the lead broke and was unable to be fully extracted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report was amended to update international medical device regulators forum (imdrf) codes.Incomplete coding of this event was identified during a retrospective review of complaints associated with capa-8580, which focused on identifying and remediating incomplete coding of events.Added patient code e2008.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of damaged/defective was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.The lead was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient with this left ventricular (lv) lead was experiencing phrenic nerve stimulation and chest discomfort.The physician decided to explant the lead; however, during the procedure the lead broke and was unable to be fully extracted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.The explanted portion of lead was not returned for analysis.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient with this left ventricular (lv) lead was experiencing phrenic nerve stimulation and chest discomfort.The physician decided to explant the lead; however, during the procedure the lead broke and was unable to be fully extracted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.The explanted portion of lead was not returned for analysis.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report was amended to update international medical device regulators forum (imdrf) codes.Incomplete coding of this event was identified during a retrospective review of complaints associated with capa-8580, which focused on identifying and remediating incomplete coding of events.Added patient code e2008.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of damaged/defective was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.The lead was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device.The allegation of fracture was confirmed based on the age of the lead; however, x-ray analysis was inconclusive and the lead was not returned for physical testing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACUITY? STEERABLE
Common Device Name
PERMANENT DEFIBRILLATOR ELECTRODES
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
road 698, lot no. 12
dorado PR 00646 -260
*   00646-2602
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key19940921
Report Number2124215-2024-49334
Device Sequence Number12595631
Product Code NVY
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P050046
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2011
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/02/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/19/2011
Device Model Number4554
Device Catalogue Number4554
Device Lot Number177660
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/18/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/08/2026
05/08/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/08/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/30/2026
06/02/2026
Date Device Manufactured08/19/2009
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-