• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DFW225
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Intraocular Pressure Increased (1937); Capsular Bag Tear (2639); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 07/16/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the left eye because during implantation the crystalline lens capsule broke.The issue was observed during insertion.There was patient injury.There was no error that led to the event.The incision was enlarged, a vitrectomy was required, and sutures were used.Diamox was prescribed.Another johnson and johnson iol (ar40e 18.5 diopter) was implanted as replacement.The patient did not have any pre-existing condition related to the eye.There was no significant interference with daily activities.Post-operative day one on jul 17, 2024, the patient's intraocular pressure (iop) was 30.The patient was given timolol and diamox.Vision was 20/400.The patient will return for follow-up re-check on jul 19, 2024.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a5: ethnicity: unknown; requested but not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site; therefore, product testing could not be performed, and the reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no similar complaints for this production order number have been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.Section h6: health effect - clinical code 4581 is to capture incision enlarged.Section h6: health effect - impact code: 4625 incision enlarged,4625 sutures, 4625 unplanned vitrectomy.An attempt to obtain additional information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was received for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: aug 15, 2024.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: a lens was received in an opened non-j&j sterilization pouch.Visual inspection of the complaint lens reveal that it was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned, and no additional issues were identified.The complaint issues were not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key19945163
Report Number3012236936-2024-000221
Device Sequence Number7244367
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474751828
UDI-Public(01)05050474751828(17)241002
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/02/2024
Device Model NumberDFW225
Device Catalogue NumberDFW225U185
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/16/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/22/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/08/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/28/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/02/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
HEALON PRO, (B)(6)
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight82 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-