|
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC SMART PORT CT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
CT80STPD |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bacterial Infection (1735); Pain (1994)
|
| Date of Event |
04/03/2015
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The customer's reported complaint description of patient infection cannot be confirmed given the patient centric nature of this serious adverse event (sae).No port/catheter device was returned for evaluation since there was no report of port/catheter device malfunction, damage or performance issue during use.Dhr review of the indicated packaging lot revealed no quality related issues or manufacturing deficiencies at the time of manufacture.Certificate of conformance for the pyrogen/endotoxin and sterility reports were verified to be approved at time of distribution.The patient infection was observed more than 48 months after the port implant procedure indicating that the manufacturing/packaging/sterilization of the port device is likely not a contributing factor to the infection.Potential source of port infection is care/maintenance of the port device and/or port access (i.E.Non-aseptic technique), which is cautioned in the device dfu.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) that is provided in the smartport device contains the following directions and precautions: contraindications catheter insertion in the subclavian vein medial to the border of the first rib, an area which is associated with higher rates for pinch-off.Warnings: the device is to be implanted, used, maintained, and removed in strict accordance with institutional and or centers for disease control (cdc) guidelines or policies.Reuse of single-use devices creates a potential risk of patient or user infections.Contamination of the device may lead to injury, illness or death of the patient.Do not use syringes smaller than 10 ml syringe when accessing the port as system damage can occur.Flushing occluded catheters with small syringes can create excessive pressures within the port system.Absence of a blood return or a poor blood return can be a sign of a potential complication such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, fibrin formation, thrombosis or malposition.This should be evaluated prior to device usage.A blood return should be present prior to usage of device for any therapy or testing.Do not attempt to measure the patient's blood pressure on the arm in which a peripheral system is located, since catheter occlusion or other damage to the catheter could occur.If the patient complains of pain, or there is swelling when the device is flushed or when medication or contrast media is administered, evaluate the device for infiltration, proper needle placement, and potential complications such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, thrombosis or malposition.Failure to assess these complaints or observations can lead to device failure.Precautions: carefully read and follow all instructions prior to use.Strict aseptic technique is of paramount importance when implanting any device.Potential complications: use of an angiodynamics port system involves potential risks normally associated with the insertion or use of any implanted device or indwelling catheter including but not limited to: erosion of vessel and skin implant rejection infection necrosis of scarring of skin over implant area vessel trauma post-operative care: the incision site should be monitored for signs of infection, inflammation, hematoma, device rotation or erosion.Routine wound care should be given to these sites.The smart port ct implantable port may be used immediately after verification of catheter placement.Instruct patient to avoid any heavy exertion or strenuous activity during the first few days after surgery.General guidelines each access of an angiodynamics smart port ct implantable port should be performed using aseptic technique.Follow institutional universal precautions.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On or about (b)(6) 2013, plaintiff (b)(6) underwent placement of an angiodynamics smartport product, reference number (b)(4), lot number 588538.The device was implanted by dr.(b)(6), m.D., at (b)(6), due to poor iv access.On or about april 3, 2015, plaintiff (b)(6) brought his son, plaintiff (b)(6), to the clinic at (b)(6) hospital with complaints of purulent material at the port site.Blood cultures were drawn and were positive for pseudomonas aeruginosa and klebsiella pneumoniae.Plaintiff's medical team determined that the smartport was the source of the infection and that the defective port had to be removed.On or about (b)(6) 2015, plaintiff's defective port was removed by dr.(b)(6), m.D., at (b)(6) hospital.As a result of having the smartport implanted, plaintiff has, allegedly, experienced significant pain and suffering, has undergone additional surgeries, and has suffered financial or economic loss, including, but to limited to, obligations for medical services and expenses.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|