| Catalog Number |
72290134 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Peeled/Delaminated (1454); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Superficial (First Degree) Burn (2685)
|
| Date of Event |
07/23/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after an adenoidectomy procedure, the patient lip was burnt on the corner where the coblation halo wand has been laying on the lip.The wand was inspected, it appears as the casing have been compromised and the metal underneath seems to have blanched the patient¿s lip.The burn on the lip was white and 1st degree, vaseline was applied on the burn.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference case: (b)(4).H3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states that based on the limited information provided the clinical root cause of the reported events could not be determined and we are currently unable to rule out a user technique vs procedural variance as a contributing factor to the reported event, which does not represent a device malfunction.The device ifu does warn, ¿do not use the product if it is damaged or if the product is not fully functioning¿.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.If any additional information related to this event is received in the future, this investigation will be reopened for further assessment.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6 codes updated.Results of investigation: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection observed the returned instrument shows no manufacturing abnormalities.The saline line has been cut from the end of the device, but most of the line remains.The shaft sleeve has been damaged from an external object, exposing internal shaft metals halfway up the shaft.Product was out of the original packaging.No packaging returned.A functional evaluation revealed plugging in the wand causes a wand end of life error.Using a bypass box, the wand had no issues producing plasma or activating coag.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states that based on the limited information provided the clinical root cause of the reported events could not be determined and we are currently unable to rule out a user technique vs procedural variance as a contributing factor to the reported event, which does not represent a device malfunction.The device instructions for use does warn, ¿do not use the product if it is damaged or if the product is not fully functioning¿.The root cause has been associated with component failure.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include damaged insulation from contact with another surface (i.E.Metal mouth gag).Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|