|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.D9: device availability and return date were updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation codes were added: 4109, 4111 and 3331.H6: investigation findings code was added: 180.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 4307.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received the reported implant and mount for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned devices identified the implant and bundle mount with signs of use.The implant was seen damaged around the collar region, likely due to the removal process.During a functional test the implant did not disengage/release from the mount as intended.The implant has signs of use and its original packaging was not returned therefore, the condition of the product / packaging delivered to the customer is unknown / non-verifiable.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation is incorrect techniques used during implant placement - customer error.Therefore, based on the available information, and functional testing device malfunction did occur.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|