|
Zimvie complaint (b)(4).The following fields have been updated: b4: date of this report, b5: describe event or problem, d4: additional device information, g3: date received by manufacturer, g6: type of report, h1: type of reportable event, h2: follow up type, h3: device evaluated by manufacturer, h4: device manufacturer date, h6: adverse event problem and h10: additional narrative.Zimvie received one (1) ieeha443, (certain® bellatek® encode® emergence healing abutment 4.1mm(d) 4.1mm(p) 3mm(h)) for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned device identified the abutment with signs of use.The abutment's packaging was not returned for evaluation.Additionally, functional testing with an in-house implant verified the abutment seated as intended.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 1275528.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 1275528 for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: does not seat.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation is incorrect techniques used - customer error.Therefore, based on the available information, and functional testing the abutment malfunction did not occur.The reported event/coob was non-verifiable since the condition of the product/packaging received by the customer was unknown / non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.
|