| Model Number |
22072 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/24/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Upon completion of the investigation into this event a follow up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Customer reported that during the procedure when removing rings, part of the graft was coming off.Graft was was implanted with rings on.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information stated: attempted to remove rings before implantation and then due to poor removal - proceeded to implant with rings on.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
N/a.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation summary: this complaint reports that while removing the rings (helix) from an advanta vxt graft (p/n 22072, l/n 508270) part of the graft was coming off.The surgeon attempted to remove rings before implantation and then due to poor removal- proceeded to implant the graft with rings on.The portion of the graft that was peeling was removed before implanting the graft.The procedure was a femoropopliteal bypass case.An image of the device was provided.The tools used in the case were not provided.This complaint, based on the image provided, is confirmed, however a device nonconformance cannot be confirmed.The dhr for lot and relevant subassemblies were reviewed and no anomalies in manufacturing were found.All samples tested from this lot passed helix peel strength testing during manufacturing.No ncrs were identified for any of these lots.There is no evidence to suggest that manufacturing, equipment, or design are related to the complaint root cause.Complaint trending found that the actual occurrence level did not exceed the anticipated occurrence level.No excursions were identified.The ifu provides adequate instructions for the use of this device and cautions a user not to use a damaged a device and how to avoid causing damage to the device.It also provides specific instructions about how to remove the helix.The ifu states that in the case that the outer layer frays, the procedure can still be completed as long as the base layer is intact.There is no indication that the product was nonconforming when it left the manufacturing facility or that the instructions for use were inadequate.The pictures of monofilament provided did show strands of ptfe stuck to them, however there was no information provided on the helix removal technique and process used.The graft was successfully implanted and there were no further issues.As the method of removal of the helix is unknown the root cause is impossible to define.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
N/a.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Complaints associated with residual eptfe strands adhering to helix upon removal related to reports of fraying/removal of outer layer of the graft during or after removing the helix (also may be referred to as rings, spiral or support).The failure mode has not caused or contributed to a death or serious injury in the past two years and has a remote probability of resulting in a death or serious injury, as documented within the risk management file.Additionally, the failure mode has been confirmed through the medical affairs team to be unlikely to result in a death or serious injury.Atrium medical corporation will no longer report future events for complaints associated with residual eptfe strands adhering to helix upon removal related to reports of fraying/removal of outer layer of the graft during or after removing the helix, unless the failure mode is found to cause or contribute to a serious injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|