• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number APB-3-8-3D-ES
Medical Device Problem Code Stretched (1601)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/20/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3.Product analysis: equipment used: video inspection system (m-81805), ruler (m-83360), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5 as found condition: the axium prime coil was returned for analysis within a shipping box; within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch and within an introducer sheath.The unknown micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis.Visual inspection/damage location details: no damages or irregularities were found with the introducer sheath.No damages or irregularities were found with the axium prime pusher.The axium prime implant coil was found stretched and damaged within the introducer sheath with the polypropylene filament broken.Testing/analysis: the axium prime coil could not be advanced out of the introducer sheath as it was found to be stuck and was retracted out proximally.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil stretch¿ was confirmed, but the cause could not be determined.Possible causes of coil stretching are, lack of hydration before procedure, user does not maintain continuous flush, tortuous anatomy, coil not retracted in a one-to-one motion with the implant pusher during repositioning, pushwire rotation, user advances the coil against resistance, damage to micro catheter or incompatible catheter.Customer reported vessel tortuosity as minimal, devices were prepared per ifu, no friction was noted during test or delivery of coil, continuous flush was administered, no repositioned was performed.As the unknown micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the micro catheter towards the coil stretching could not be determined.As the model and lot numbers were not reported, compatibility could not be assessed.The event is reported conservatively at this time based on analysis findings.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that the axium coil was found stretched.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of an amorphous, ruptured aneurysm in the anterior communicating artery with a max diameter of 8.2 mm and a 3.4 mm neck diameter.It was noted the patient's blood flow was normal and vessel tortuosity was minimal.It was reported that the surgeon was preparing to deliver the coil to embolize the aneurysm during the surgery, but found that the coil was stretched inside the protective sheath and could not be used.It was reported the coil was stretched.There was no friction or difficulty during testing or delivery.The continuous flush was administered during the procedure.The damaged/stretched located was on the implant coil.The physician did not reposition the coil during the procedure.The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.Additional information was received.The cause of the stretch was not determined there were no issues that resulted in the damage that was found.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX  22570
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX   22570
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635265677
MDR Report Key19993714
Report Number9612164-2024-03735
Device Sequence Number7001847
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00763000313746
UDI-Public00763000313746
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K151447
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 08/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberAPB-3-8-3D-ES
Device Catalogue NumberAPB-3-8-3D-ES
Device Lot Number227675476
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/08/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/02/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/06/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-