|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H11 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j employee.H3, h4, h6 photo investigation: the product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.The photo investigation revealed that '388.72, rod cutter¿ had broken blade.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to unintended forces.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the rod cutter would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, potential cause can be attributed to component failure due to unintended forces and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Physical device investigation: the product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.Visual inspection found that a fragment of one blade was broken off.Broken fragment was not returned for analysis.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a component failure that may have been caused by exposure to unintended forces.A dimensional inspection was unable to be performed due to post manufactured damage.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the rod cutter would have contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to a component failure, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review (dhr): part number: 388.72, lot number: 5836p63 (wo# (b)(4)), manufacturing site: tuttlingen, release to warehouse date: 31-jul-2023.A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.The raw material certificate was reviewed and the used material was according to the specification of the device.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that on july 18, 2024, while the surgeon was cutting schanz screws from the large external fixation set during application of the external fixator to a fractured ankle, the bolt cutter blade broke but still successfully cut the rod.There was no patient consequence.This report involves one rod cutter.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|