• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number AR40E
Medical Device Problem Code Ejection Problem (4009)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/23/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a3b,: unknown/ asked but not available.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation and the serial number for this device is unknown/not provided; therefore, no further product investigation can be performed.Should any further relevant information become available a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported the patient was getting a "piggy back" lens placed in the sulcus of his eye.When the lens was inserted into the eye it flipped upside down.It was decided that we would remove the lens and replace it, rather than try to flip it.Miostat was used to reduce pupil size.The patient is doing well.No injury or additional medical intervention was required.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device available for evaluation: yes device date returned to manufacturer: aug 06,2024 device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: the lens was received in a vial which was in a bag that was in the original folding carton.Also received was the original lens case, patient stickers, an implant notification card and an opened sterilization pouch.Visual inspection reveal that the lens was received with a cut on the optic body and the cut extends through the haptic drill hole.The cut haptic is missing.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order was performed.Conclusion: the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENSAR IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20022435
Report Number3012236936-2024-000215
Device Sequence Number20673599
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474501843
UDI-Public(01)05050474501843(17)280816
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOK
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/13/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberAR40E
Device Catalogue NumberAR40E00020
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/26/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/22/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/21/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/13/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/16/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight93 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-