|
EXACTECH, INC. NV GXL LNR, +5LAT, 32MM G1-48/50MM CUPS; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
136-32-51 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Osteolysis (2377)
|
| Date of Event |
05/20/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that approximately 88 months after a right total hip replacement procedure, the patient underwent a revision procedure to address prosthesis wear, worsening pain and lateral-sided pain, osteolysis, polyethylene wear and debris.Revision surgery operative notes were provided.Patient left the operating room in stable condition.Post operative diagnosis noted wear of the implant.No further issues or complications were reported.No additional information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D10: concomitant devices: 4671068 186-01-50 - integrip cc, cluster 50mm, g1 4244604 164-03-12 - element-stem, collared w/ha, std offset, sz 12 3680295 170-32-03 - biolox delta femoral head 32mm od, +3.5mm 4357579 170-32-07 - biolox delta femoral head 32mm od, +7mm the device was not returned for evaluation and no medical or other records containing treatment information or patient information have been received; therefore, the reported event cannot be confirmed, nor can the circumstances or potential causes or contributors to the alleged event be evaluated.Should additional, material information become available that permits more analysis or conclusions, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Based on the available information, the patient meets the following risk criteria for early prosthesis wear and/or osteolysis: implanted with a lateralized liner, combination of largest available femoral head and/or thinnest available acetabular liner was used, and implanted with a component having a shelf age of greater than 2 years.The most likely cause for the reported revision due to prosthesis wear and osteolysis may have been a combination of risk factors such as use error, implant positioning, implant size selection, and patient factors (fitness for surgery, biomechanics, activity level and local tissue oxidation potential).However, this cannot be confirmed as the devices were not returned for evaluation, and images and radiographs were not provided.H6: corrected health effect and investigation clinical codes.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|