• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BIRPTR 2.3 PK SUTURE ANCHOR W/ ULTRAB; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BIRPTR 2.3 PK SUTURE ANCHOR W/ ULTRAB; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72201541
Medical Device Problem Code Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Perforation (2001)
Date of Event 08/01/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an arthroscopy, the bioraptor suture anchor got pulled out when the surgeon pulled the suture during the knot.The procedure was completed with a smith and nephew back up device in an additional bone hole using a twist drill 2.45 mm of bioraptor to prepare the insertion site and leaving a void in the patient.There was a delay less than 30 minutes and no further complications were reported.The patient is fine.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference: case-(b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: h3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A clinical review states a user technique/procedural variance cannot be definitively ruled out as a potential contributing factor.The patient impact is determined to be the suture anchor pull-out which resulted in use of a backup device in an additional bone hole.Further complications would not be anticipated in a young male patient with good bone quality.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.If any additional information related to this event is received in the future, this investigation will be reopened for further assessment.H12: h2: corrected data on h1 (type of reportable event).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed that it was returned in original packaging with the batch number of the complaint on the label.The anchor was returned off the device with no visible defect other than bio debris.No sutures were returned, and the insertion device has no visible defect.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A clinical review states that the ifu includes importance of site prep, alignment, and avoidance of excessive force in addition to warnings/precautions/instructions.A clinical root cause could not be determined based on the limited information provided; however, a user technique/procedural variance cannot be definitively ruled out as a potential contributing factor.A definitive root cause for the reported issue could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Based on this investigation, there is no evidence to suggest a design, material or manufacturing issue.Therefore, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIRPTR 2.3 PK SUTURE ANCHOR W/ ULTRAB
Common Device Name
FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key20046155
Report Number1219602-2024-01809
Device Sequence Number7955640
Product Code MBI
UDI-Device Identifier03596010595072
UDI-Public3596010595072
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIN
PMA/510(K) Number
K152566
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/03/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number72201541
Device Lot Number2129958
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/01/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/03/2024
02/27/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/23/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/04/2024
03/03/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/30/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age33 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-