• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US SIGMA HP UNI FB KEEL OSTEOTOME; KNEE INSTRUMENT : CUTTING INSTRUMENTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US SIGMA HP UNI FB KEEL OSTEOTOME; KNEE INSTRUMENT : CUTTING INSTRUMENTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 202447111
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/22/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
When using the tibial osteotome to remove the bone from the keel slot, the metal button at the end of the osteotome came loose because of a hammer blow.When removing the osteotome the whole instrument fell apart.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint (b)(4).D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information received, "when using the tibial osteotome to remove the bone from the keel slot the metal button at the end of the osteotome came loose because of a hammer blow.When removing the osteotome the whole instrument fell apart".The product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.See attachment (complaint (b)(4)).The photo investigation revealed that sigma hp uni fb keel osteotome has been broken.Potential cause can be attributed to unintended use error by use of excessive force in a prying motion and overload of the material.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the [sigma hp uni fb keel osteotome ] would not contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, unintended use error and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the device lot number is unknown, therefore a¿device history review could not be performed.If the lot/serial number becomes available, the record will be re-assessed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: added: d4 (lot), d9, h4.Corrected: d4 primary udi number.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: when using the tibial osteotome to remove the bone from the keel slot the metal button at the end of the osteotome came loose because of a hammer blow.When removing the osteotome the whole instrument fell apart.The product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual analysis of the returned device found that the sigma hp uni fb keel osteotome was broken from the end cap that secures the cap to the shaft.The broken fragment was not returned for evaluation.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a component failure that was caused by exposure to excessive forces and unintended impactions.Additionally the device presents signs of wear and deformation at the tip, consistent through the 10 years of service.The observed condition was identified as an end of life indicator; damage consistent with repeated use and servicing.The lifecycle requirements of the device are event related and depend on the use and inspection of the device in clinical practice.As the device can be damaged on the first or 100th use, the device must be properly inspected prior to each surgical use.Refer to the device/country specific ifu for information related to end of life, reprocessing instructions, and inspection procedures.A dimensional inspection was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.A functional test was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the sigma hp uni fb keel osteotome would have contributed to the complained issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot.The product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.H11 additional narrative: corrected: h3.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SIGMA HP UNI FB KEEL OSTEOTOME
Common Device Name
KNEE INSTRUMENT : CUTTING INSTRUMENTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. 1818910
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw, IN 46581
3035526892
MDR Report Key20074712
Report Number1818910-2024-18062
Device Sequence Number3075005
Product Code HWM
UDI-Device Identifier10603295083191
UDI-Public(01)10603295083191(10)GM4214003
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySZ
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/27/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number202447111
Device Lot NumberGM4214003
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/22/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/28/2024
10/17/2024
10/30/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/27/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/29/2024
10/21/2024
10/31/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/20/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-