| Catalog Number |
75000670 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/06/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during thr surgery, a polarcup trial insert slotted 28/59 broke when a mallet was used.Two pieces broke off and were removed from the patient.The procedure was resumed, without any delay, using the same device.No injury was reported as a consequence of this issue.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: it was reported that, during total hip replacement surgery, a polarcup trial insert slotted 28/59 broke when a mallet was used.Two pieces broke off and were removed from the patient.The procedure was resumed, without any delay, using the same device.No injury was reported as a consequence of this issue.The complaint device was returned for investigation.A visual evaluation of the device was conducted, and it was concluded that there is a fracture where the two slotted parts of the device broke off.Both of them were returned.A review of the production documentation did not detect any deviation that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.The complaint history review for the complaint device revealed no additional complaints for the affected batch nor additional complaints for the same product number over the past 12 months with similar failure mode.Previous investigations demonstrated that the performance of the device is within the risks level that are anticipated in the risk management documentation.No further escalation is required.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode, occurrence and severity of the reported issue.There is no indication that the reported device failed to meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The root cause of the reported event remains undetermined.Considering the performed visual inspection, it is suspected that the mentioned device failure arose from a ¿wear and tear" issue.Normal wear and tear are known to contribute to the reported event.Additionally, repeated steam sterilization processes could contribute to an embrittlement.According to document "processing (cleaning, disinfection and sterilization) of instruments from smith & nephew orthopaedics ag", all devices must be inspected and controlled for proper functioning after cleaning/disinfection.The need for further actions is not indicated.Nevertheless, smith+nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.The returned device will be discarded.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|