|
An mdr is indicated for this complaint.It was reported that a patient was implanted with a prodisc c device at level c5-6 on (b)(6) 2021.Patient began experiencing radicular symptoms and the implant was removed on (b)(6) 2024.The patient was converted to a two level acdf.A review of the dhr found no anomalies associated with the complaint.Complaint trending found that the rate of complaints is within the level defined in the risk documentation.A review of the risk documentation found that the harms associated with the complaint are identified and mitigated to a level where the clinical benefits outweigh the risks.A device evaluation could not be completed as the implant was not returned following removal surgery, additionally, no pre-removal imaging was provided.The removal was due to ongoing radicular symptoms, a reason that the therapy / device was not effective is unknown.This submission is 1 of 1 devices involved in this event.
|