|
It was reported that: "patient information: sex: unknown.Disease name: 7 mm aneurysm in mca.Procedure: planned procedure.Micro catheter: unknown.Assist stent: neuroform alas 3.0 mm x 21 mm/stryker.Y connector: unknown.Used coils: optimax 7x20 (1st coil) , optimax 6x15 (2nd coil), i-ed complex infini 3-5x15/kaneka medix (3rd coil).Description: after placement of the microcatheter tip inside the aneurysm, the neuroform atlas stent was deployed from the inferior trunk to the mca, and then coil embolization was performed with the jailing technique.The physician placed optimax 7x20 and optimax 6x15 into the aneurysm as the first and second coils, respectively, and the implant coils were successfully detached.After that, the physician inserted the ied complex infiniti 3-5x15 into the aneurysm, attempted to deploy it, and found that the straightened coil had the behavior of migrating out of the aneurysm.Therefore, the physician retrieved the ied coil.The coil that migrated outside of the aneurysm remained in the same place, and it was unclear whether it was the optimax 7x20 or the optimax 6x15.The patient's monitor value was bad just after stent placement, so the procedure was completed without retrieval of the two implanted optimax coils or treatment of the straightened coil that had migrated out of the aneurysm.There was no extension of operating time due to this event.It is unknown whether the physician performed pre-use check." update 30jul2024 - additional information received from the issuer: " 1.What is the current patient condition? - currently, the patient is experiencing mild hand paralysis, but it is not a critical condition.Furthermore, i would like to inform you additional information.After the deployment of atlas, there were changes in the vessel course compared to before the deployment, which resulted in a deterioration of the patient's monitoring value.Although the monitoring value was compromised immediately after the deployment of atlas, there were no visible indications of a worsening condition.".
|
|
Balt usa reference #(b)(4).An evaluation of the actual complaint sample could not be performed as device was unavailable to be return.Based on the provided information, root cause could not be definitively determined.Lack of device return prevented deeper evaluation of the reported issue.Review of the lot history records did not reveal any in-process or lot-specific issue that could account for the observation.No additional complaints against lot number f230900448 has been made for the same issue.Comprehensive analysis of this failure mode has remained subject to monitoring for any unacceptable increase in trend.The submission of this report or related information to the fda, and its release by fda, does not reflect a conclusion by the party submitting this report of the fda that the report or related information is an admission that the manufacturer, their employees, or the device caused or contributed to the reportable event.
|