|
EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIBIA IMPLANT PSC INSERT, SZ 2.5, 11MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
02-012-44-2511 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unstable (1667); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Joint Laxity (4526); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
04/20/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D10 concomitant products: 5813793 - 02-020-11-0325 - truliant ps cem fem ps cem right sz 2.5 5861967 - 02-022-45-2515 - truliant tib fit tray cem sz 2.5f / 1.5t 6528684 - 200-02-35 - three peg patella 35mm 5809327 - 201-78-12 - holding pin lg head sharp point med 2pk.The product associated with the reported event is within the scope of recall z-0021-2022: however, there is insufficient information to evaluate whether the subject issue of the recall was a cause or contributor to the reported event.The device was not returned for evaluation and no medical or other records containing treatment information or patient information have been received; therefore, the reported event cannot be confirmed, nor can the circumstances or potential causes or contributors to the alleged event be evaluated.Should additional, material information become available that permits more analysis or conclusions, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported via legal documentation that approximately 31 months after a total replacement procedure, the patient underwent a revision procedure to address prosthesis wear, pain, swelling and instability.Post operative diagnosis noted wear of the implant.No further issues or complications were reported.No additional information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: corrected the following: medical device problem code, type of investigation.Manufacturer narrative updated: the reason for the revision reported cannot be confirmed from the information provided but may be the result of prosthesis wear and instability or due to inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Additionally, a contributing factor to the reported wear may have been the result of being packaged in a non-conforming vacuum bag for more than five years.Potential contributions of user and patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and images and radiographs were not provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|