|
The device was not returned for evaluation.Lot history record (lhr) and corrective and preventive actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.In this case, it is likely that anatomical conditions contributed to the reported failure to advance and while advancing against resistance, the tip pf the barewire separated resulting in unexpected medical intervention to retrieve the separated portion of the wire.Based on the reported information, there is no indication that the reported failure to advance and material separation resulting in unexpected medical intervention is related to a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|