• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number FEM08120
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/06/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 02/2027) h11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a stent graft placement procedure, the delivery system allegedly seemed to be stuck when attempting to remove the sheath.It was further reported that more force than usual was allegedly required to remove the sheath.Reportedly, upon removal, the tip of the delivery system was found to be separated from the rest of the system.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the delivery system was returned for evaluation and the stent graft was completely deployed and was not returned as it was implanted in the patient; the distal part of the catheter including the sheath marker was detached and remained hanging on the delivery system.The break and detachment of the catheter is thought to have resulted from difficult removal as reported by the client which leads to confirmed results for break, detachment and difficult to remove.It was reported that the tracking vessel was neither tortuous nor calcified, the lesion was pre-dilated.Based on the provided information and the evaluation of the returned sample, the investigation is closed with confirmed results for break, detachment and difficult to remove.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling, it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risks.The instructions for use state: "if resistance is encountered when removing the delivery system, it is recommended to remove the delivery system, introducer and guidewire as a single unit".Regarding accessories the instructions for use states: "0.035" (0.889 mm) guidewire with a length at least twice as long as the endovascular system" and "introducer sheath with appropriate inner diameter".The packaging pictograms indicate an introducer size of 9f and a 0.035" guidewire.The instructions for use also mentions detachment of device parts as a potential complication.H10: d4(expiry date: 02/2027), g3, h6(component).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a stent graft placement procedure, the delivery system allegedly seemed to be stuck when attempting to remove the sheath.It was further reported that more force than usual was allegedly required to remove the sheath.Reportedly, upon removal, the tip of the delivery system was found to be separated from the rest of the system.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Common Device Name
ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstr. 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key20113841
Report Number2020394-2024-01316
Device Sequence Number15278100
Product Code PFV
UDI-Device Identifier04049519008523
UDI-Public(01)04049519008523(10)ANJP1169
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P130029
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/13/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberFEM08120
Device Lot NumberANJP1169
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/06/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/13/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/31/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age37 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight82 KG
-
-