|
An event regarding instability involving an ceramic head was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of provided medical records with a clinical consultant indicated: "summary: this product inquiry concerns a female patient who was 62 years of age at the time of the event.She underwent implantation of a left total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2024.Apparently, the patient developed instability and required revision surgery on (b)(6) 2024.At that time according to the product inquiry summary the revision was carried out by cementing and all poly liner into the existing competitor cup.Confirmation of event: i can confirm that the patient had a primary total hip arthroplasty with a competitor system on (b)(6) 2024 since i was able to review the operation note.I can also confirm that the patient had what would appear to be a revision arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2024 using a stryker restoration modular hip system with dall-miles cables and a ceramic head based upon the implant usage sheet.It does report using a single low profile hex screw.I cannot explain this without the use of a cup.I can also confirm that the patient had another hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2024 with a stryker constrained acetabular insert, biolox ceramic head and a restoration modular implant with dall miles cables.This confirmation is also by way of the implant usage sheet on august 6.I do not have any other corroborating information such as operation notes doctors notes or post dislocation/revision x-rays.Root cause analysis: the root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.The causes of early dislocation of a revision total hip arthroplasty are multifactorial including surgical technique, especially in the restoration of leg lengths and soft tissue tension in the thigh, and positioning of the components.The fact that the greater trochanter was virtually absent can also contribute to dislocation.Patient postoperative cooperation, activity level and bmi will also contribute." product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to instability.A review of provided medical records with a clinical consultant indicated: "summary: this product inquiry concerns a female patient who was 62 years of age at the time of the event.She underwent implantation of a left total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2024.Apparently, the patient developed instability and required revision surgery on (b)(6) 2024.At that time according to the product inquiry summary the revision was carried out by cementing and all poly liner into the existing competitor cup." the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as return of the device, pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|