|
Batch review performed on 07 june 2024.Lot 2354341: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 22-jan-2024.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, no other similar events have been reported on the same lot during the period of review.Visual inspection performed by r&d project manager based on the analysis of the complaint device and pictures of the associated instruments (i.E., nitinol guidewire) used during the procedure, it appears that the nitinol guidewire used to guide the screwdriver was bent.A possible root cause of the wire bending could be due to unintentional incorrect insertion orientation of the wire relative to the existing bone tunnel, causing the wire to become "stuck" within the bone or the graft in the created bone tunnel.As a result, due to the inadequate direction of the guidewire, the screwdriver, coupled with the mectascrew c, may have collided with the nitinol shaft during insertion, introducing extra forces on the screwdriver tip, and as a result causing its breakage.Therefore the device's failure root cause, in this case, could be associated with a minor surgical technique execution discrepancy.Clinical evaluation performed by medical affairs director during the insertion of a mectascrew c interference screw, the tip of the screwdriver broke.The available x-ray image shows one radiopaque speck at the lateral condyle level, which potentially may be interpreted as a metal fragment.Additionally, a second, less radiopaque speck, is visible more proximally but its nature is difficult to ascertain.The single projection makes it challenging to precisely determine their locations within the knee.If these specks are indeed fragments of the instrument, they would be made of medical grade stainless steel not approved for long term implantation.Therefore, we cannot guarantee that leaving fragment(s) in situ may not cause secondary problems.However, retrieving such small fragment(s) would undoubtedly be a very difficult and invasive procedure, so the surgeon decided to avoid it.Note: the incident occurred on may 28th, 2024 and medacta became aware of the event on the same day.Initially, it was hypothesized that the small signs visible from the x-rays were fragments originating from the screw, which is composed of resorbable material.During the preparation of the final report on aug 26th, 2024, an overview of all the analyses and investigations carried out on the case was conducted.It was precisely at this stage that the clinical analysis provided crucial insights, revealing that the fragments could potentially be metal fragments originating from the broken instrument, although it cannot be confirmed.Consequently, given the implications of these findings, the risk assessment was carefully reconsidered and adjusted, leading to the decision to report the case.
|