|
As received, the specimen consisted of one-1 each pkg-hydro gw std s 150-038; returned reloaded within the dispenser assembly and double-bagged within "zip-lock" style poly biohazard pouches.The specimen presented an overall length of 150.1cm and a finished diameter of.03605" to.03685".A gage bushing certified to be.0380" passed over the length of the specimen with no more effort than the mass of the bushing sliding down the wire shaft unaided, except by gravity.Note all diameter measurements were acquired with a non-contact, toolmakers scope after allowing the specimen device to become dry after hydrating the specimen device with blood-bank saline.Upon flushing the dispenser hoop with blood-bank saline, the specimen was easily removed and subjected to visual and tactile examination.The specimen presented skived/cut damage to the polymer jacket material, including metallic core wire exposure and core wire fracture.The overall length of the damage is 17.3cm from the proximal aspect of the core wire fracture.Three separate sections of polymer jacket material totaling 17.5cm in length was returned with the specimen.The specimen also presented kink/bend damage located approximately at 2.2cm from the proximal aspect of the core wire fracture.Except where noted, the specimen device appeared visually and dimensionally correct.A review of the device history records of the specimen device does not present any indication of manufacturing defect or anomaly that could have impacted on the event as reported.During manufacturing the production operators are instructed to 100% visually and tactilely inspect for any obvious defect, which includes a tactile examination of the entire length of each wire.In addition, during packaging of this product the operators are instructed to 100% visually inspect for any obvious defect prior to shipment.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.Our investigation was unable to confirm that the product did not meet specification prior to shipment.The investigation concluded that the product met specification at the time of shipment.As noted in the device instructions for use (dfu) warnings: · do not manipulate, advance and/or withdraw the zipwire hydrophilic guidewire through a metal cannula or needle.Manipulation, advancement and/or withdrawal through a metal device may result in destruction and/ or separation of the outer polymer jacket requiring retrieval.If a needle is used for initial placement, a plastic entry needle is recommended when using the zipwire hydrophilic guidewire.Extreme caution should be observed when used with a one-wall puncture style needle.· manipulate the zipwire hydrophilic guidewire slowly and carefully in the urinary system while confirming the behavior and location of the wire's tip under fluoroscopy.Excessive manipulation of the zipwire hydrophilic guidewire without fluoroscopic confirmation may result in perforation or trauma of the linings or associated tissues, channels, or ducts.If any resistance is felt or if the tip's behavior and/or location seem improper, stop manipulating the wire and/or catheter and determine the cause by fluoroscopy.Failure to exercise proper caution may result in bending, kinking, separation of the zipwire hydrophilic guidewire's tip, damage to the catheter, or damage to the urinary system.If necessary, remove the zipwire hydrophilic guidewire and ancillary device or scope as a complete unit to avoid complications.Note, requests were submitted for a listing of the models of devices used with the zipwire; however, this information was not provided.At this time, it is not possible to assign a definitive root cause for the event as reported.Based on the information provided and the evidence presented, it appeared that handling and/or procedural factors have contributed to the event as reported.If any further relevant information is provided, a follow up medwatch report will be submitted.
|
|
Event description: per medwatch, it was reported that : i noted the fragment of guidewire coating in renal pelvis attached to the previously placed access needle.This was removed under direct vision by grasping fragment and removing it.Next i turned attention to renal pelvis stone, this was extracted using the trilogy device.Once all the visible stone was removed, i again ensured no fragments of broken wire were in collecting system and removed the access needle (based on endoscopic evaluation with rigid instruments and fluoroscopy).A 5 fr open ended catheter was then placed over the sensor wire and down ureter.An 18 fr council tip was placed into renal pelvis over the other wire.Location was confirmed to be in renal pelvis with nephrostogram.The balloon on catheter was inflated with 3 cc after antegrade nephrostogram confirmed its placement into the right renal pelvis.The sheath was removed and catheter and 5 fr were secured with a 0 silk.The patient was flipped into the supine position he was then awoken from general anesthetic without incident, transferred to the hospital gurney, and taken from there to the post-anesthesia care unit for postoperative monitoring.At the end of the case, the sponge, instrument, and needle counts were correct.I was scrubbed and present throughout the entire case.Foley catheter was left in place.And 18 fr council tip was left connected to drainage.These will be removed in am.He will have a computed tomography scan to reevaluate stone burden prior to discharge.
|