|
Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes) system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.Visual and functional inspections were not performed due to the device was not returned.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.Additional information provided by the customer indicated the patient's current condition is good, both modified ranking scale (mrs) & national institute of health stroke scale (nihss) as 0.This was observed per core lab reading.Site reported >25-50% stenosis within flow diverter (fd).No other finding observed.There was no neurological deficit or sequelae noticed due to stenosis.The patient was not on any added medication or treatment due to the reported event.In the physician¿s opinion, just per core lab reading, no relevant adverse event reported.Based upon medical review, the harm observed in this complaint is anticipated in nature as per the device risk assessment.As a product related root cause does not apply and the issue is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure and/or patient condition noted within the dfu, product labeling and/or risk documentation files, an assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication will be assigned to this complaint.
|