|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3,h4,h6: the product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found no problems or damage in the device.The device presents an overall worn appearance consistent with constant usage for over 16 years.A functional evaluation was performed.The locking mechanism was opened and closed several times it was noted that the teeth of the locking mechanism did not grip each other.This condition can be related to the costumer allegation.However no breakage was found in the device.The observed condition was identified as an end-of-life indicator; damage consistent with repeated use and servicing.The lifecycle requirements of the device are event-related and depend on the use and inspection of the device in clinical practice.As the device can be damaged on the first or 100th use, the device must be properly inspected prior to each surgical use.Refer to the device/country-specific ifu for information related to end-of-life, reprocessing instructions, and inspection procedures.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the reduction forceps points ratchet 200 would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to end of life, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is required.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review (dhr): part number: 399.98, lot number: t923266, manufacturing site: tuttlingen, release to warehouse date: 29-may-2008.A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number and a nonconformance report was initiated due to burrs from milling on the end screw.The necessary actions to ensure the final product quality have been taken and documented in the appropriate quality system.The nc has no impact on the complaint condition.The final quality release criteria were met before this batch was released for distribution.Review of the raw material certificate could not be established during this review due to the age of the device (over 16 years old).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.E1: initial reporter is j&j company representative h3, h6: the device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|