| Model Number |
OPTI0517CSFMX |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Stretched (1601)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/05/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Balt usa reference (b)(4).An evaluation of the actual complaint sample could not be performed as device was unavailable to be return.Based on the provided information, root cause could not be definitively determined.Lack of device return prevented deeper evaluation of the reported issue.Review of the lot history records did not reveal any in-process or lot-specific issue that could account for the observation.No additional complaints against lot number f231100323 has been made for the same issue.Comprehensive analysis of this failure mode has remained subject to monitoring for any unacceptable increase in trend.The submission of this report or related information to the fda, and its release by fda, does not reflect a conclusion by the party submitting this report of the fda that the report or related information is an admission that the manufacturer, their employees, or the device caused or contributed to the reportable event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
It was reported that: " sex: unknown disease name: 4.3 mm aneurysm in a2-a3 procedure: planned procedure micro catheter: pnovus/japan lifeline assist stent: neuroform atlas/stryker y connector: unknown used coils: as per below. the physician performed stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck aneurysm at the a2-a3 branch point and chose the optimax 5x17 as a framing coil.After deployment of the neuroform atlas, the physician attempted to frame the aneurysm with the optimax 5x17 using jailed technique.During the process of repositioning the optimax 5x17 several times to get the desired shape, it became unraveling.Therefore, the physician cut the hub of the microcatheter and retrieved the optimax 5x17 with snare.After that, the procedure was completed with competitive coil.The physician commented that the unraveling occurred at the coil wire distal to the delivery pusher, not at the implant coil.The distal access catheter was advanced up to the ic top.From the ic top to beyond the aca, there were no tortuous anatomy.It is unknown whether the physician performed the pre-use check." update 13aug2024 - additional information received from the issuer: "1.Did the procedure involve tortuous anatomy? no." incident report form submitted for this complaint indicates that no patient injury was sustained.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|