• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRT225
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Failure to Advance (2524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/04/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4, a5, a6: unknown/ not applicable since no patient contact.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as no indication that lens was implanted.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as no indication that lens was implanted, hence not explanted.Section h3- no: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) toric was damaged in the preloaded injector and it was not implanted.The surgery tech (very experienced tech) told the surgeon that the plunger would not advance and she didn't want to put any more force on it.The surgeon inspected it under the scope but could not see why it would not advance.As the customer only order one lens and no backup, before leaving the patient aphakic, and the surgeon hoped that he could salvage the iol and load it manually.The surgeon then cut through the injector plastic behind the lens.Once the surgeon had a small window to see the lens, he could see that one of the haptics had broken off, therefore he knew that he could not salvage the iol.Regardless, the surgeon left the patient aphakic.It was noted that there was no patient contact with the product and that a secondary iol placement will occur when iol arrives.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: upon further review it was noted that section g4: pma/510(k) number in the initial mdr was inadvertently submitted missing the ¿p¿ before the numerical value.The complete number is p980040.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20163563
Report Number3012236936-2024-000245
Device Sequence Number15282018
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474811935
UDI-Public(01)05050474811935(17)270620
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateGU
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/08/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRT225
Device Catalogue NumberDRT2250195
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/03/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/15/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/06/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/07/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured06/20/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-